@CaterinaZhang ‘s list seems very clear on what the major tasks that need to be accomplished, whether it is under a moniker of NEO 2 or NEO 3 seems irrelevant.
All of those tasks should have links to the relevant GitHub issues or projects associated with them.
I generally agree with @the-sky-i
We don’t need fancy names or a clear divide between what goals are for NEO 2 and what goals are for NEO 3 since the lines are blurred. Incremental progress, clear task breakdowns, and project status are better for marketing a serious project.