Похожие записи

• [LiskHQ/lisk] Investigate maxRelays and broadcastLimit numbers (#2077)

  @MaciejBaj Are you sure that adjusting those params is a proper way to fix our current issues? It works fine on `0.9.x`.

• [LiskHQ/lisk] Investigate maxRelays and broadcastLimit numbers (#2077)

  @4miners the P2P protocol is not compatible with 0.9.x - there is a difference between how the headers are being propagated. It's worth to simulate what's the ratio of reached peers during broadcasts while adjusting…

• [LiskHQ/lisk] Investigate maxRelays and broadcastLimit numbers (#2077)

• [LiskHQ/lisk] Solutions to improve Lisk DPoS (#353)

  @lichuan > because the only consensus algorithm be suitable for public chain is POW. Proof?

• [LiskHQ/lisk] Solutions to improve Lisk DPoS (#353)

  LiskHQ has dynamic transaction fees on the developers roadmap. Why don't we introduce dynamic voting fees? I am not sure if it would a hard fork but i can imagine it falls under the same…